``balance_classes`` ------------------- - Available in: GBM, DRF, Deep Learning, Naïve-Bayes, AutoML - Hyperparameter: yes Description ~~~~~~~~~~~ During model training, you might find that the majority of your data belongs in a single class. For example, consider a binary classification model that has 100 rows, with 80 rows labeled as class 1 and the remaining 20 rows labeled as class 2. This is a common scenario, given that machine learning attempts to predict class 1 with the highest accuracy. It can also be an example of an imbalanced dataset, in this case, with a ratio of 4:1. The ``balance_classes`` option can be used to balance the class distribution. When enabled, H2O will either undersample the majority classes or oversample the minority classes. Note that the resulting model will also correct the final probabilities ("undo the sampling") using a monotonic transform, so the predicted probabilities of the first model will differ from a second model. However, because AUC only cares about ordering, it won't be affected. If this option is enabled, then you can also specify a value for the ``class_sampling_factors`` and ``max_after_balance_size`` options to control the sampling. - ``class_sampling_factors`` takes a list of numbers which would be the sampling rate for each class. A value of ``1`` would not change the sample rate for a class, but setting it to ``0.5`` would reduce its sampling by half, and ``2`` would double its sample rate. - Alternatively, you can utilize ``max_after_balance_size`` which is the max relative size your training data can be grown. By default, it is ``5``: this will oversample the data to rebalance the training data. The max it can grow to is 5x larger than your original data, hence, the value of 5. If you have many rows and prefer to under-sample the majority class, you can set ``max_after_balance_size`` to a value of less than ``1``. **Notes**: - This option is disabled by default. - This option only applies to classification problems. - Enabling this option can increase the size of the data frame. Refer to the following link for more information about balance classes: `https://gking.harvard.edu/files/0s.pdf `__. Related Parameters ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - `class_sampling_factors `__ - `max_after_balance_size `__ - `weights_column `__ Example ~~~~~~~ .. tabs:: .. code-tab:: r R library(h2o) h2o.init() # import the covtype dataset: # this dataset is used to classify the correct forest cover type # original dataset can be found at https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Covertype covtype <- h2o.importFile("https://s3.amazonaws.com/h2o-public-test-data/smalldata/covtype/covtype.20k.data") # convert response column to a factor covtype[, 55] <- as.factor(covtype[, 55]) # set the predictor names and the response column name predictors <- colnames(covtype[1:54]) response <- 'C55' # split into train and validation sets covtype_splits <- h2o.splitFrame(data = covtype, ratios = 0.8, seed = 1234) train <- covtype_splits[[1]] valid <- covtype_splits[[2]] # try using the balance_classes parameter (set to TRUE): cov_gbm <- h2o.gbm(x = predictors, y = response, training_frame = train, validation_frame = valid, balance_classes = TRUE, seed = 1234) print(h2o.logloss(cov_gbm, valid = TRUE)) # grid over `balance_classes` (boolean parameter) # select the values for `balance_classes` to grid over hyper_params <- list( balance_classes = c(TRUE, FALSE) ) # this example uses cartesian grid search because the search space is small # and we want to see the performance of all models. For a larger search space use # random grid search instead: {'strategy': "RandomDiscrete"} # build grid search with previously made GBM and hyperparameters grid <- h2o.grid(x = predictors, y = response, training_frame = train, validation_frame = valid, algorithm = "gbm", grid_id = "covtype_grid", hyper_params = hyper_params, search_criteria = list(strategy = "Cartesian"), seed = 1234) # Sort the grid models by logloss sorted_grid <- h2o.getGrid("covtype_grid", sort_by = "logloss", decreasing = FALSE) sorted_grid .. code-tab:: python import h2o from h2o.estimators.gbm import H2OGradientBoostingEstimator h2o.init() h2o.cluster().show_status() # import the covtype dataset: # this dataset is used to classify the correct forest cover type # original dataset can be found at https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Covertype covtype = h2o.import_file("https://s3.amazonaws.com/h2o-public-test-data/smalldata/covtype/covtype.20k.data") # convert response column to a factor covtype[54] = covtype[54].asfactor() # set the predictor names and the response column name predictors = covtype.columns[0:54] response = 'C55' # split into train and validation sets train, valid = covtype.split_frame(ratios = [.8], seed = 1234) # try using the balance_classes parameter (set to True): cov_gbm = H2OGradientBoostingEstimator(balance_classes = True, seed = 1234) cov_gbm.train(x = predictors, y = response, training_frame = train, validation_frame = valid) print('logloss', cov_gbm.logloss(valid = True)) # grid over `balance_classes` (boolean parameter) # import Grid Search from h2o.grid.grid_search import H2OGridSearch # select the values for `balance_classes` to grid over hyper_params = {'balance_classes': [True, False]} # this example uses cartesian grid search because the search space is small # and we want to see the performance of all models. For a larger search space use # random grid search instead: {'strategy': "RandomDiscrete"} # initialize the GBM estimator cov_gbm_2 = H2OGradientBoostingEstimator(seed = 1234) # build grid search with previously made GBM and hyperparameters grid = H2OGridSearch(model = cov_gbm_2, hyper_params = hyper_params, search_criteria = {'strategy': "Cartesian"}) # train using the grid grid.train(x = predictors, y = response, training_frame = train, validation_frame = valid) # sort the grid models by logloss sorted_grid = grid.get_grid(sort_by='logloss', decreasing=False) print(sorted_grid)